The public purpose
The economic case has to be read alongside service requirements, affordability and the responsibilities of the authorities and operators involved. The way a project benefits its users matters to its funding model.
Financing and institutional advice for assets that serve communities over decades.
Infrastructure carries obligations that stretch far beyond construction. A financing decision must account for public priorities, delivery risk, operating costs and the people who will ultimately use the asset. AFII's background in government advisory and infrastructure finance informs how these projects are considered.
Roads, civic infrastructure, public facilities, transport-linked assets and utility-related programmes can all involve different contractual and funding arrangements. AFII's work is centred on the commercial and institutional questions that make infrastructure development possible.
Good advice begins with understanding the constraints and choices specific to the underlying business or asset.
The economic case has to be read alongside service requirements, affordability and the responsibilities of the authorities and operators involved. The way a project benefits its users matters to its funding model.
Procurement routes, risk allocation, milestones and the capacity of counterparties influence the terms on which capital might be available. Early clarity is particularly important where several public bodies or delivery partners are involved.
Capital structure should remain credible once the initial construction phase is over. Maintenance, revenue collection, performance and eventual handover deserve as much attention as financial close.
A project can be well designed and still be difficult to finance. Understanding the institutions, the cash flows and the route to operation is what brings those two conversations together.
Explore Our ExpertiseAFII examines the project rationale, participants and practical readiness of an opportunity before considering the financing route. Public-public partnership and coordinated public-enterprise models may be relevant where they suit the mandate.
Advice may consider the appropriate blend of sponsor capital, debt, institutional participation and project-specific arrangements, taking into account implementation risk and the intended duration of the asset.
The value of finance advice is strongest when it connects the objectives of the project sponsor, public counterparties, technical teams and funding institutions into a workable decision process.
Every mandate has its own commercial reality. The best starting point is to understand that reality properly.
Share the commercial context and the kind of advisory support you are looking for. We can begin with a focused conversation.